Application & credential screen
Résumé, JD, active bar status, and engagement history reviewed against what the work requires.
Reviewers & quality
The bench you'd put your name on.
Every reviewer on a matter has cleared the same screening and is matched to the work by tracked performance — not pulled from a list. Whether we're running under your brand or on your matter directly, here's how we build a team you can defend.
i.
How we screen.
Credentials up front; the right skills confirmed before anyone joins a matter.
Conflicts check
Screened against the active client roster before any assignment.
Skills pre-screen, per project
Before a reviewer joins a matter, we confirm they have the specific skills it calls for — subject matter, review type, and language.
ii.
The bench is curated by performance.
Screening is the entry bar, not the whole story.
We track each reviewer's accuracy and calibration by project type and subject matter, and organize them into talent pools by demonstrated strength. When a matter comes in, we match the reviewers whose tracked performance fits it — and reviewers who fall below the bar come off the work.
The result is a pool that's curated, not just assembled — which is how the institutional knowledge from one matter shows up on the next.
iii.
Language coverage.
Native fluency, verified per matter — not coursework. Long-tail languages resourced through
a vetted partner network.
EnglishSpanishFrenchGermanMandarinJapaneseKoreanPortugueseItalianRussianArabicDutchPolishHebrewCantoneseVietnameseHindiTurkish + more on request
Every reviewer on a multilingual matter is screened against a representative document set in their language before they're deployed.
iv.
Quality control.
A full review pass plus sample-based QC. Sampling adjusts per matter and sensitivity.
The three-pass model.
Every document gets a full review pass plus sample-based QC layers. Sampling depth adjusts per matter and sensitivity.
- 100% Pass 1 — Reviewer Every document coded by a vetted reviewer against the protocol.
- Sample Pass 2 — Team-lead QC A stratified sample re-reviewed by a team lead.
- Sample Pass 3 — Senior QC An independent sample re-reviewed by a senior reviewer or delivery lead.
Need a team you can defend?
Tell us about the matter — size, languages, timeline — and we'll come back with a staffing plan and a quote.